Every country realizes the potentiality of ICO token but at the same time it’s deteriorating image of being a scam has led many investors to run for their money now. To ease this perception about ICO development and rip the benefits of an ICO token as an investment, major countries worked out on laws and regulations to eliminate scam ICO projects and to control the investment flow. Continuing the three-part series, following are other significant countries which affect ICO market and have laws for ICO token investment:
ICO Token Rules in Australia
Australian government implemented a customer (investor) centric approach to control the unpredictability of Initial coin offering market. Moreover, each component of an ICO development process spread over with clear laws and guidelines for ICO development companies. Following are the official guidelines published by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC):
Under regulatory guide 228, rights and prospectus of ICO token issuing company should be released, if ICO tokens are to raise company funds.
ICO Token Rules in Canada
Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) explained ICO token regulations through a staff notice. First, it mentions that ICO regulations will be overseen on case-by-case and a “regulatory sandbox” will apply to each FinTech projects which do not fit under any national regulatory schemes. Following are some to look out for:
ICO Token Rules in Switzerland
Swiss government did not release any regulations or guidelines to control ICO development projects. But a Hawkeye is on each project being released in the country and on issuers of ICO tokens coming from other countries to attract investors. The Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) published following guidelines to assess each ICO company and ICO projects:
ICO Token Rules in the United Kingdom
The United Kingdom took a cautious approach towards decentralized investment – ICO token. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) circulated a public notice to warn on high risks associated with cryptocurrencies and ICO tokens. Major national banks banned the exchange of cryptocurrency for fiat currency. Moreover, FCA decided that ICO tokens will fall under administrative boundaries of UK based on each case. Cryptocurrency exchange platforms and digital wallet Development Company fall under the anti-money laundering regulatory framework of UK.
One must complete “specified activities relating to specified investments” set in FSMA order 2001 (RAO).
The Gibraltar Financial Services Commission (GFSC) is one of the regulatory authorities of UK. It proposed a DLT framework aligning with principles declared by FCA. The structure guides ICO businesses to not to carry out any regulated activities before acquiring authorization or exemption from FCA. To do that, one must complete “specified activities relating to specified investments” set in FSMA order 2001 (RAO).
Apart from these countries, many countries are taking cautious steps to pass needed laws and guidelines as Initial Coin Offering can change how a country’s common man plans their investments over the years and how high net worth investors’ investment decisions can affect a country’s economic situation.
We hope you have found this article informative and interesting. For more information or queries visit@icodevelopment.io and know more about this technology. You can also contact us or send us an email at sales@icodevelopment.io